Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly linkup of book bloggers hosted by That Artsy Reader Girl! My opinions on books often change over time, so with this week’s subject, what I want to do is go back to the first ten books I reviewed on this blog and see how I feel about them a few years later.
Rating then: 10/10
Rating now: 10/10
Comments: This book is a masterpiece.
Rating then: 3/10
Rating now: 2/10
Comments: I stand by my low rating of this book, which I barely remember…in fact, it feels fair to lower my already low rating because I can’t remember getting anything at all out of this book.
Rating now: 3/10
Comments: This book was very bad and I rated it as such and I stand by that rating.
Rating now: 2/10
Comments: Another one of those that I can barely remember, except that it felt like it threw a bunch of trendy YA concepts into a blender with Korean mythology (the author is white, so it’s not even an own voices book).
Rating now: 8/10
Comments: I really did enjoy this deep dive into linguistics, but it’s very dry and technical and something I’m not super eager to re-read…though I would enjoy reading more along the same lines.
Rating now: 9/10
Comments: This is a very, very good memoir, but usually I reserve that 10/10 for something that feels like a masterpiece and with some time in the rearview, this isn’t a masterpiece.
Rating now: 3/10
Comments: I spent a LOT of time slogging through the four volumes of this psychoanalytic perspective on the history of world mythology. It could have been about 1/3 the length and still would have been dense. I think I rated it higher at the time because I wanted to believe it was better than it was for all the time I invested in it.
Rating now: 6/10
Comments: This book is solid, but when I read it I thought it was better than I think it is now.
Rating now: 10/10
Comments: This, on the other hand, is a masterpiece and continues to deserve its rating.
Rating now: 4/10
Comments: I don’t think this book was bad, there just wasn’t much there. Some images from it have stayed with me, but with very few exceptions I remember so little of it I might as well have never read it at all.