
Popular culture has long been fascinated by King Henry VIII of England and his wives. And I’m counting myself there, too! There are multiple biographies of these women, and even more fictionalized versions of their stories. But his wives were not the only women to define the king’s life. His mother and grandmother were both powerful sources of influence. And while we might all remember that he had a brother, since marrying his brother’s widow kicked off his notorious matrimonial career, he also had sisters.
Maria Perry’s The Sisters of Henry VIII is about exactly what the title says: the lives of Henry’s two sisters. Henry VII and his wife, Elizabeth of York, had four children who survived to adulthood: Arthur was the oldest, the heir. Then there was Margaret, then Henry, then Mary. Arthur was intended for the throne, Henry for the church…which obviously changed when Arthur died of consumption shortly after his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. While royal boys could be given substantive roles, though, there was only one thing royal girls were destined to be: brides. Both Margaret and Mary would be queens: the former of Scotland, and the latter of France. But that is where the similarities in their stories ends.
Mary’s story is more frontloaded with drama: she was wed to King Louis VII of France at 18, who was 34 years her senior and was delighted to have a very young wife. But being already advanced in age when he wed Mary, he did not have long to live and died only a few months after their wedding. As their parents had also since died, Mary’s future was now in the hands of her brother Henry, and she had extracted from him a promise that she would be able to marry a man of her choosing once Louis passed. Despite the fact that he apparently thought there was enough of a risk she would chose to marry his close friend, Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, that he warned him again going through with a wedding beforehand, Henry sent Brandon to collect Mary from France. They wed only a few months after Louis’s death, creating not only quite a rage in Henry, but a precarious situation if she had fallen pregnant, as it would not have been clear which husband had fathered a child. After this initial kerfuffle, though, Mary and Charles had a long marriage and she was eventually accepted back into her brother’s good graces. It was through descent from Mary that Lady Jane Grey and her family made a claim to the throne when her cousin, Edward VI, died.
Margaret, on the other hand, really lived through some stuff. She was married to James IV of Scotland in an effort to bring his kingdom into the orbit of England. They had one child (James V, who would go on to father Mary, Queen of Scots, who would go on to mother James VI/James I of England) who survived infancy in their five years of marriage before he died in battle with England. As the regent for her young son, she found herself (and her child) caught in power battles between Scotland’s clans, and then went ahead and made it worse by marrying the Earl of Angus. He openly cheated on her, using her money to support himself, his side piece, and their child, which she understandably objected to. She was finally able to get a divorce (after having a child, Margaret Douglas, who would mother Henry, Lord Darnley, who would father James VI with Mary Queen of Scots), but then married another man who also cheated on her and took her money. She was eventually mostly reconciled with her son and third husband before her own death.
These women, especially Margaret, lived very interesting lives, with multiple marriages and plenty of scandals. Which makes it a real pity that Perry’s book is so incredibly dry and honestly pretty boring. On a certain level, I get it. It’s published by an academic press, and not really meant to be a history for a “popular” (rather than professional) audience. But I don’t think that necessarily means you have to drain all the sense of drama and intrigue out of your narrative, especially when you have this kind of material to work with! Margaret fired cannons at her estranged second husband when he tried to mess with her plans for holding power in Scotland! This is juicy stuff, and I wish there had been some liveliness in the prose to match it.
In fact, Margaret’s life was so full that I found myself resenting it a little bit when Perry would return attention to Mary, who really settled down when she got back to England with Brandon. It seemed like she felt she had to make an attempt to at least somewhat balance attention to each of the women, though Scotland’s complicated politics made me want more context for Margaret as well as there just being more material there. Throughout the book, with both women, I found myself often confused about members of the nobility being referred to, as Perry used both surnames and titles (Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk being both Brandon and Suffolk) interchangeably to refer to the same person and since virtually every major male figure in these women’s lives were members of the nobility and had at least two names that could be used, it made it hard to follow at times. If you’re a Tudor completist, this is worth reading to get more information about the lives of Henry’s sisters. But I wouldn’t recommend it for someone not in the mood for an academically-oriented history text.

In Life…




